He satisfactorily completed an original probationary period, and, thereby, acquired permanent status in class in the classified service of the State. Ferguson, commenced his employment with the State of Wisconsin as a Management Information Specialist 2 with the University of Wisconsin. "On August 14, 1970, the Appellant, Donald R. The facts of this case as set forth in the trial court's decision are undisputed: Ferguson's discharge does not deprive him of any constitutional rights. We hold that the board did not have jurisdiction to hear Mr. Ferguson deprive him of a liberty interest protected by fourteenth amendment due process? Did the reasons given by the department for terminating Mr. Ferguson's employment by the department deprive him of a property interest protected by fourteenth amendment due process? Ferguson denied fourteenth amentment equal protection because state employees receiving intra-departmental promotions retain their tenure rights, but state employees receiving inter-departmental promotions, such as Mr. Ferguson's appeal alleging that his discharge from the classified service was not for just cause under sec. Did the board have jurisdiction under sec. Ferguson's case because he was not an employee ". The circuit court reversed the board's order on the theory that the board lacked jurisdiction to hear Mr. The board ordered the respondent Department of Health and Social Services (D.H.S.S.) to immediately reinstate appellant Donald R. 227 review of proceedings under the civil service law before the appellant, State Personnel Board (board). This is an appeal from a circuit court order in a ch. Gaebler, and Lawton & Cates of Madison, and oral argument by Mr. La Follette, attorney general.įor Donald R. Rice, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was Bronson C. *678 For the respondent the cause was argued by David C. *677 For the appellant there was a brief and oral argument by Keith R. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & SOCIAL SERVICES, Respondent,
0 kommentar(er)
